7gen Bloc

Why Education Belongs Back on the Agenda

Set Font Size:
A | A | A
Article Tools
Print  Email Share This
del.icio.us del.icio.us Digg This! digg reddit reddit facebook facebook newsvine newsvine
By Inspired Protagonist - September 5, 2008

Chalkboard and EraserThe bleak economy has increasingly dominated the headlines. It's easy to see why, given the yo-yoing stock market and through-the-roof energy prices. But the economy's difficulties have overshadowed an equally troubling trend: since the late 1960s, U.S. high-school graduation rates have steadily declined.

Riane Eisler, in her wonderful book, "The Real Wealth of Nations: Creating a Caring Economics," eloquently made the case that the caring parts of our economy (education, healthcare, childcare, parenting) have been so devalued, they put society's health at risk. Recently, David Brooks of the New York Times reviewed several books that trace how the decline in educational attainment has led to the forfeiting of "…America's lead over its economic rivals."

This troubling development threatens the country's long-term prospects. It also widens the gap between rich and poor, as Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz describe in their book, "The Race Between Education and Technology."

"In periods, like the current one, when educational progress lags behind technological change, inequality widens," write Goldin and Katz. "The relatively few skilled workers command higher prices, while the many unskilled ones have little bargaining power."

We've all read about India and China's huge investment in training professionals of all kinds. Brooks argues that in the U.S., our "skills slowdown is the biggest issue facing the country." He rightly reminds us, as we send our kids back to school, that "this slow-moving problem, more than any other, will shape the destiny of the nation."

photo: Sharat Ganapati

Comments
an easier solution to the problem of skills slowdown
Posted by anvor | Sun, Sep. 7, 2008

One serial entrepreneur said a great phrase: “Employees commiserate, entrepreneurs brainstorm.”

I have three University degrees, used to be a University professor and my wife is still teaching there. We both are very pro-education, but we find that the unrelenting shrill of demands for more conventional education in this country is quite misplaced.

To listen to some, you’d think that stewing kids in schools for more and more years, like the books discussed by Brooks propose, is the only way to attain national prosperity. But as Canadian, European and especially Eastern-European experiences show, more degrees do not create more and better jobs (I presume that better jobs and better living are the final goals of educational investment.) We cannot school the country into prosperity in the absence of productive risk-taking, otherwise known as entrepreneurship.

China, India, and Brazil, the unlikely nations to encroach on our prosperity, do so despite the huge disparity between our vast funding for our okay schools and stellar universities and their shortage of funds for their ramshackle schools and so-so universities. They grab our high-skill jobs not because they beat us on some ”school years per student” ratio, but because they have the entrepreneurial zeal for those jobs and a favorable dollar exchange.

We can do little about the dollar, but we can do a lot about our entrepreneurial zeal.

Although few of us can tough it out as lone entrepreneurs, given a supportive group environment, all of us can be far more entrepreneurial collectively, within our established companies or communities in a way somewhat similar to support communities of Grameen Bank. Once entrepreneurially engaged, instead of vegetating in front of TVs, we'll want to learn everything we need to know about our business. We'll do it within or without school walls, ensuring our life-long learning.

So, I'd say that it is not the money or the greatness of educational bureaucracies that is sorely missing in our country: it is the supportive environment for such company- or community-based entrepreneurs.

Mind you, the typical school desk-based courses on entrepreneurship won't fix the problem. Having been to some of those, and seeing the meager results, I offered some "big people" a better method for increasing the level of community- or in-company entrepreneurship. Sadly, the educational establishment and even "the titans of industry" are not serious about the loss of entrepreneurial spirit in America. They are even not serious or about increasing their profits via employee empowerment. What they are serious, however, is about commiserating on the lack of educational attainment...

...like it's going to help.

Andrei Vorobiev

Unschooling, not more "schooling"
Posted by Weatherlight | Wed, Sep. 24, 2008

If you want formal education to help people in the real world, it will have to be redone. While people who grow up in a certain culture tend to take many of its aspects for granted, getting a better perspective shows that much of the world isn't just "normal," it's wrong.

Even some American schools like Century School are doing a vastly better job of doing real educating than most modern schools. We should be heading in that direction more.

I'm not exactly a wonderfully productive money machine, but I'd probably be even worse if I had stuck with our current formal education system. If anything, I'm ashamed that I didn't have the insight and intelligence to get out of it before I turned 14.

I think it's not an exaggeration to say that the formal education is one of the most obvious symptoms and causes of today's rampant mental illnesses, "normal" narcissism, emotion dysfunction, apathy, and inability to get priorities straight. The entire system--arbitrary and irrelevant goals, competition and pressure from grading, one-size-fits-all teaching, punishment for behavior and differences in learning, emphasis on rote memorization, lack of effective methods, suppression of enthusiasm and autonomy, favoring of repetition over reinforcement, segregation by age, not to mention the social dynamics that are taught--needs to be abolished. Individual teachers attempting to encourage real learning within the current system is not enough, especially considering that it tends to get worse with less age, and how formative the early years are.

Education
Posted by fraziermk | Wed, Sep. 24, 2008

All I can say is that I would not let my kids education be in the hands of others. We homeschool for lots of reasons, one being the state of our educational system. Not all kids are the same so why do we continue to teach that way is beyond me. Life is to short to be sitting in school when you have the entire world to explore.

SCHOOL IS NOT LIFE...
LIFE IS SCHOOL...

The big picture
Posted by athomemommie | Wed, Sep. 24, 2008

As a teacher and researcher myself, I have found that no matter all the reform efforts over the last 50 years, none have had as profound an affect as the influence made by those that have given their lives to God via Jesus and his service. Yes i hear the bleating against God but it doesn't over shadow the truth. The truth is that while vouchers would enormously restructure education as we know it, for the better mind you, it is only a pin drop in comparison to the home schoolers that are far ahead of the common student. Why? When everyone against it pleads that parents are starving their children from healthy friendships. The reason is simple, God. When God is given authority in our lives as parents everything under us, namely our children, are blessed beyond our simple understanding. Home schoolers are well rounded, surround by loving parents, other supportive family members, a real life understanding implementing all things learned educationally. Home schoolers have higher test scores all across the board and even higher ACT/SAT scores. When God is given control he fixes all the mistakes and everything comes together, not to mention that mom's are happier being with their children too =)

No Child Left Behind leaves many behind
Posted by drkatyyc | Wed, Sep. 24, 2008

As I high school teacher, I see first-hand effects of NCLB. 90% of students are supposed to graduate, at just about any cost. Per the school administration, teachers have to "dumb-down" classes and pass students to the next level, whether the students are ready or not. Many of our students cannot read above elementary reading level and because of the "no-fail" policy in the elementary and middle school levels, the high schools have to deal with the gaps in learning of the low-level learners.
Another issue is funding or the lack thereof. Many of my colleagues have 35 students per class. Ideally, a smaller class size is more conducive to learning, as a teacher can devote more time to students and discipling students is easier. As it is, there is a higher instance of discipline problems.

Education need to come back to the forefront. Do away with NCLB and let teachers do their job.