7gen Bloc

Strange Bedfellows? Why Seventh Generation Is Doing Business With Wal-Mart’s Marketside Stores

Posted By
Inspired Protagonist
October 6, 2008

MarketsideI’ve sometimes said that hell would freeze over before Seventh Generation would ever do business with Wal-Mart. In fact, at times I've made even more strongly worded statements. Now I’ve got to concede that I was wrong. For the first time ever, the Seventh Generation logo is appearing in a handful of stores that are owned by Wal-Mart.

This weekend, Wal-Mart launched a new retail concept, dubbed Marketside, which initially consists of four small (10,000 to 12,000 square feet) stores in Arizona. Marketside delivers fresh, ready to eat meals along with natural and organic foods. The stores are debuting with ten Seventh Generation cleaning and paper items; ours is the only natural home-care brand that’s offered.

Marketside stores are operated and staffed independently from Wal-Mart. Their look and feel, as well as their value-proposition, is unlike anything you’d find at one of the Bentonville behemoth’s super-sized emporiums. This is not a discount store with rock-bottom prices. But Marketside is a wholly owned subsidiary of the world’s largest retailer, so make no mistake: While we’re selling to Marketside, we’re doing business with Wal-Mart.

We are not, however, about to put Seventh Generation’s products in Wal-Mart’s supercenters. Far from it. Our partnership with Marketside is akin to a software product that’s entering beta. It’s a small first step that’s very much under development. There remain many issues to explore, questions to answer, and bugs to discover. We will rely on the early adopters among our customers, consumers, and other stakeholders to test the concept and help us decide whether we should even think about taking a next step.

Nevertheless, this was not an easy decision to make and it was not made alone. In fact, it might have been the toughest call we've ever made. Please bear with me while I explain our thinking.

Some Background
For many years, Seventh Generation has refused to sell to Wal-Mart and I have been highly critical of the company, even as I (and many, many others) have worked to help make it better. As recently as July, I laced into Wal-Mart for tolerating abusive store managers who forced employees to work off the clock. But while the smiley-faced giant continues to give us much to frown over, it's an undeniable fact that Wal-Mart is changing in a very big way.

Wal-Mart's audacious environmental goals (which we played a small role in formulating)—to be supplied by 100 percent renewable energy and create zero waste—certainly got our attention. The goals are as immodest as they are improbable. But Wal-Mart is making real progress—and progress towards principled social goals as well.

To cite just a very few examples (a full evaluation would fill an entire book): Wal-Mart improved the efficiency of its sprawling truck fleet by 15%. It launched experimental, energy-conserving stores that feature wind turbines, solar panels, and xeriscape gardens. It became the world’s largest buyer of organic cotton; it slapped more than 40% of its audited factories with "high risk" violations; and it’s filled almost 40% of its management ranks with women.

True, Wal-Mart's performance is far from unblemished (more on that below). But as we watched Wal-Mart change, we began to change, and we soon found ourselves openly discussing what once was unthinkable: Should we do business with Wal-Mart? Whatever the answer, it was clear that we couldn't decide without hearing from you.

Last November, we floated the idea in an interview I gave to Fortune.com. We followed up with an article in our newsletter, the Non-Toxic Times. Many of you responded with thoughtful, often impassioned emails. And as anyone at Seventh Generation will tell you, the debate flared within our associate community. Simply contemplating selling to Wal-Mart often sparked more heat than light. So we got strategic and came up with three criteria to arrive at our decision:

1. Don't just trust - verify.
Last summer, we put a spin on that old Reagan axiom, "trust, but verify." We created an index that rated 19 mass retailers, including Wal-Mart, on their social and environmental performance. The companies were scored in 15 categories, which compared each retailer’s average hourly wage, the percentage of employees covered by health insurance, their carbon- and waste-reduction goals, their commitment to green building, and more.

To our great surprise, we found that Wal-Mart scored at or near the top in most categories. Which begged the question: How can we not sell to Wal-Mart, when it is out-performing some of our own retail partners?

2. Change that matters.
We are impatient with the incremental changes and timid half-steps toward corporate responsibility that too many big, public companies have taken. Wal-Mart is to business what California is to Detroit—both are giants that can reshape entire industries. So we not only wanted to see Wal-Mart begin to change itself, we wanted to see it begin to change its vast ecosystem of suppliers, retail partners, and consumers. And it has.

Wal-Mart, which sold 100 million compact fluorescent light bulbs in 2007, is almost single-handedly leading the switch from incandescent to energy efficient lighting. And it’s insisting that manufacturers reduce the mercury content in the bulbs they make. It’s pressuring its 60,000 suppliers to slash their packaging by 5% over the next five years, the equivalent of removing 213,000 trucks from the road. It transformed the entire laundry detergent industry—and saved vast amounts of natural resources along the way—when it achieved its goal of selling only double-concentrated liquid detergent in all of its US and Canadian stores.

On these and hundreds of other issues, Wal-Mart is using its clout to force positive changes throughout its supply chain, on a scale that only a federal regulatory agency could match. How many other companies are even attempting to do the same?

3. Fierce conversations.
None of us expects to always agree with Wal-Mart. But we do expect to talk candidly and forcefully with the people who stand behind that smiley face. Sadly, that wasn’t the case three years ago, when I met with Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott. At the time, Wal-Mart was hunkered down in its Bentonville bunker, hiding out from its many critics.

I told Scott that Wal-Mart's tattered relationship with labor unions was a fundamental problem, and his refusal to meet with the Service Employees International Union was totally unacceptable. Apparently, Scott heard the same from other critics, because 18 months later, he and SEIU chief Andy Stern announced a goal of achieving affordable health care for all US residents by 2012.

I also told Scott that Wal-Mart's opaque, self-congratulatory Web site, which put a happy face on the company's blemishes and concealed its real impact on society and the environment, was a stellar example of treating Corporate Responsibility as mere Public Relations. Again, he must have heard the same from many others. Wal-Mart has brought real transparency to its Web site, as evidenced by its detailed performance overview on its sustainability progress—and lack of progress. Walmart.com should never be your only source of information, but at least it’s starting to take a cold-eyed look at the company’s performance.

Making the Leap
There were three non-negotiables that were absolutely foundational to our decision to move forward with the Marketside account. We wanted social and environmental commitments that were specific enough to hold Wal-Mart accountable. We wanted a certain level of transparency—a clear line of sight into whether Wal-Mart was making real progress. And we wanted engagement—evidence that Wal-Mart was talking to and working with its critics. After months of investigating, we had to admit that Wal-Mart had changed.

But as I said, it was a very tough call. Our friends at Wal-MartWatch have made it clear that the world’s largest retailer still has its dark side: "Wal-Mart is currently facing the largest workplace-bias lawsuit in US history for widespread discrimination against women employees…Wal-Mart’s new stores will use more energy than its energy-saving measures will save….Wal-Mart has received numerous fines for violating the Family Leave and Medical Act."

I could go on, but you get the idea. Wal-Mart is a good company and it's a bad company. But there is considerable evidence that Wal-Mart is genuinely trying to do better. While there is much that’s still wrong with Wal-Mart, it’s also wrong for us to essentially boycott a retailer that is working hard to improve.

Some of you will say that selling to Wal-Mart is synonymous with selling out. I said as much two years ago, in a very public statement. I respect your point of view, and I encourage you to keep the heat on Wal-Mart and on us. And I ask you to consider the following:

Over the past several weeks, we have all endured a wrenching lesson in what happens when some financial institutions get “too big to fail.” Well, Wal-Mart is too big to not achieve its ambitious social and environmental goals. Whether it’s climate change, health-care reform, or natural-resources depletion, we can’t take on the world’s challenges without Wal-Mart and its tens-of-thousands of partners and suppliers. At this point, we now believe that we can have a bigger impact by partnering with Wal-Mart than by shunning it.

Just as Wal-Mart is experimenting with Marketside, Seventh Generation is experimenting with Wal-Mart. Our hypothesis: Wal-Mart will continue its progress. It will put real muscle into solving its many problems. And it will continue to meet our three non-negotiables (accountability, transparency, and engagement).

We will continue to closely monitor Wal-Mart. And if our premise proves false, we will walk away from this very tentative partnership. But even if the results prove promising, we will proceed very cautiously with Wal-Mart. And as I said earlier, we will look to you, our stakeholders, to help keep us on the right path.

I realize this isn’t going to make me a more popular guy, but I also believe—to the core of my soul—that it’s the right thing to do. Seventh Generation is now available in four Marketside stores in Arizona. Just maybe, that’s a good thing.

Tweet this Share this on MySpace Digg this de.li.cio.us E-mail this Print this More share options
Comments
full dislocure
Posted by samfw | Mon, Oct. 6, 2008

I applaud your full disclosure here. Two questions -
1) I'm wondering if you discussed with Adam Werbach at all? He made a similar transformation in his thinking.
2) Can you share the index you refer to where you ranked retailers by their responsibility?

Thanks
Sam

Sounds like Marketside is
Posted by mvellandi | Mon, Oct. 6, 2008

Sounds like Marketside is similar to Fresh n'Easy, and would be an appropriate fit. While Wal-Mart's supply chain and facilities management activities are nothing more than waste reduction and applied lean thinking, I do applaud them on their expanded category mgmt for sustainable products. Any retailer should do the same.

My main problem with distributing to Wal-Mart stores is their perpetual penny pinching on everyday suppliers' prices and the dangerous situation it places on them as production volume % to WM increases.

a nice self congratulatory piece
Posted by RXD | Mon, Oct. 6, 2008

It's not so much that any company's decision to work with another for (perceived) mutual gain is at issue - that should be protected. It's just that your latest statements continue to stink of self-righteousness and worse. To think that you actually believe that "I... have worked to help make it better" is laughable, and positioning the fact that your products are not in their supercenters as a process for socially responsible action to “help us decide whether we should even think about taking a next step” is dubious. You are like most people running for-profit enterprises in capitalistic environments - that is, you do what is best for you. That's actually good, it's just that the vacillating judgmental values broadcasted from your frequently used megaphone makes you look like a hyena right now (at least in the fact they will bite each others faces when the competition is stiff).

Jeffrey Hollender's reply to Sam:
Posted by Inspired Protagonist | Mon, Oct. 6, 2008

Thanks for your question, Sam. Adam Werbach is a friend and a fellow Greenpeace Board member, we have discussed this decision at length and I believe he would support it. The ranking we did is unfortunately a confidential document that we developed to evaluate retailers. If we shared this information we would violate the confidence of our retail partners.

I appreciate your candor...
Posted by cjoypalmer@hotmail.com | Sat, Oct. 18, 2008

But based on your article I have purchased my last Seventh Generation Product. I have purchased Seventh Generation products for about 16 years, ever since I found a mail order catalog in high school.
You've searched your soul, I've searched mine. I don't want anything more to do with you, please remove me from your e-mailing lists.

Cheyenne Palmer
Voting with every dollar spent.

Reply to Cheyenne
Posted by Inspired Protagonist | Sun, Oct. 19, 2008

Dear Cheyenne,

I’m so sorry you feel compelled to part ways with Seventh Generation after so many years -- 16 years is a long time. We will take your name off our mailing list.

Jeffrey

Long time overdue
Posted by laurend61 | Mon, Apr. 13, 2009

Mr. Hollender,

I realize that this blog is from about 6 months ago, but I recently wrote a paper for an undergraduate business strategy course assessing the ethics of the decision that you were faced with. Without knowing the final choice you made, I assessed the decision using three ethical frameworks and reached the same conclusion that you did. I was curious as to what decision you had reached so I did an internet search and found your blog. I applaud your courage in making a decision that may have been unpopular with consumers of Seventh Generation products. Looking beyond the surface of the issue is important in a case such as this. I already use some Seventh Generation products, but I'm planning to do so with more regularity now.

Lauren

Right, wrong... I don't know
Posted by SocialMediaMaven | Wed, Jul. 28, 2010

First, Jeffrey, I'm surprised that you let Cheyenne go without a fight! I am sure many customers feel the way she does and they're not wrong. This union is confusing and seems to go against everything Seventh Generation has always stand for. Perhaps instead of letting long-time, die-hard customers like her just walk away you can keep the dialogue going. I'm not asking you to explain, but perhaps you can cash in on the goodwill Seventh Generation has built up over the years.

Bottom Line: I don't 100% understand this choice. I will acknowledge that Seventh Generation is a business that needs to stay profitable in order to keep doing what it's doing. WalMart is...WalMart. While I choose not to shop there with any regularity, I am not naive in thinking that other companies such as Target or Whole Foods don't have shadows that we are unaware of.

Perhaps this merger will be good for WalMart and its shoppers. Perhaps it will serve as an education of sorts. I'm not really sure.

One thing I do know is that Seventh Generation products are some of the only cleaning and household products that have met the level of transparency and honesty that I require in order to have them around my family. They have set the bar very, very high in terms of corporate responsibility and education. For that reason, I'm extending a period of grace and will continue to be a customer while watching how this partnership affects both companies and great society.

Life is full of shades of gray. I'm not saying that we have to water down our ideals, but sometimes a dark room has to be stepped into so that one can find the light switch.

A 7th fan with eyes open.
Bunmi