7gen Bloc

Environmentalism's Dirty Secret

Set Font Size:
A | A | A
Article Tools
Print Share This
del.icio.us del.icio.us Digg This! digg reddit reddit facebook facebook newsvine newsvine
By Inspired Protagonist - October 23, 2009

East Oakland FactoryIt's easy to think of pollution as a problem we all share. Bad air, dirty water, chemical contamination, and other challenges spread themselves out roughly equally. Or so we think. The truth is more complicated: Some places are more polluted than others, and the worst conditions tend to be in poor and minority communities.

For too long, this has been environmentalism's dirty secret. Well-intentioned activists work on environmental issues but many go home to the relative health and safety of clean neighborhoods, which have been kept that way by money and influence that force the sources of pollution -- whether it's a chemical factory or a rail yard or waste incinerator -- into areas whose citizens lack the resources and the power to stop them.

This not-in-my-backyard phenomenon is a big problem, and it's compounded by the fact that many of the environmental burdens it shifts to suffering communities are inadvertently supported by environmentalists everywhere. The factory makes the products we like. The railyard gets them to the store. The incinerator disposes of them when their usefulness ends. And most of us of never see any of this happen because we can afford to live where it doesn't.

This environmental racism occurs on all scales from local minority neighborhoods to poor third world nations, yet most organized environmental efforts and groups have focused their attention elsewhere. For whatever reason, they've failed to recruit meaningful numbers of minority participants and have too often ignored the unique problems these people face.

A recent L.A. Times article reports that this is changing. Fed up with the often horrifying conditions in their communities, poor and minority residents are pushing back. This is good news for all of us. For one thing, environmental racism is an ugly black mark on our efforts to create a truly just and sustainable nation. On a purely moral level, it demands to be addressed. Equally important is the fact that these courageous people are trying to clean up places whose pollution ultimately affects us all.

When they win, we all win. If the environmental justice movement can become pervasive, it can succeed and force one of two things to happen. Either the root causes of much of the country's environmental blight will be erased at the source or dirty facilities will get pushed into areas whose residents are better equipped to make sure these operations clean up their act. For these and other reasons, we should encourage and help those on the front lines as much as we can. It's perhaps the best way to get to make sure that many of our environmental challenges aren't in anyone's backyard.

photo: Brooke Anderson

Comments
Environmental justice
Posted by CSRint | Mon, Oct. 26, 2009

This is where the concept of environmental justice becomes important. I have seen this played out in places like South Africa, through groups like the Environmental Justice Networking Forum, which fight to ensure that the poor do not suffer the most from environmental pollution and degradation.

I remember interviewing some community members living in squalid conditions right next to a hazardous waste disposal site, who were claiming health effects like a higher incidence of cancerous tumors. Sadly, lobby power comes with financial power and influences, so the true victims of corporate irresponsibility are seldom able to defend their human rights.

I see this in my own neighborhood
Posted by mplsfamily | Wed, Nov. 11, 2009

I live in the inner city, in a relatively nice area, yet the incidence of asthma is significantly higher in the inner city than in the suburbs because of commuter traffic and the local incinerator. Efforts to clean up and bring businesses to the area are thwarted because the commuters "aren't to go through that," aka my, "area." It's so easy to ignore these issues when the problems are not only not seen, people refuse to have to go where they will have to look at them! Sincere efforts to have a clean environment will also have the effect of reducing poverty and crime as these areas become economic attractions instead of social dumping grounds.

"Cap and Trade" will exacerbate this problem....
Posted by rainfire21485 | Fri, Nov. 13, 2009

The thing about "cap and trade" to deal with global warming--to offset greenhouse gas emissions, is far inferior to a carbon tax, especially on a local level as this article is talking about. With "cap and trade", imagine a coal-fired power plant, and all the emissions. They can end up emitting the same amount, not reducing their emissions at all, just by buying-trading for--the carbon "coupons" which other polluters may have to sell instead of use. Thus, the mercury poisoning at the local level is unchanged, (mercury causes birth defects and much more) the air quality at the local level at the site of the plant is unchanged, (asthma) etc. Thus, at the local level, "cap and trade" can make no difference at all, and we should all email, call and write our senators and representatives to push for a carbon tax.