7gen Bloc

Chlorine Doubles the Rate of Birth Defects

Set Font Size:
A | A | A
Article Tools
Print  Email Share This
del.icio.us del.icio.us Digg This! digg reddit reddit facebook facebook newsvine newsvine
By Inspired Protagonist - June 13, 2008

Chlorine in Tap WaterI have spent much of my life battling the dangers of chlorine and the household form of that chemical element, sodium hypochlorite. So it was with great interest that I sat in on a talk by Bill Morrissey, Clorox's vice president of sustainability, at the recent "Sustainable Brands" conference in Monterey, California.

I was more than a little taken aback when Morrissey told the audience of 600 people that the environmental community has misunderstood the wonders and safety of chlorine. His description would lead one to believe that chlorine is one of the worlds most benign chemicals. I know that isn't so, but no one stood up to challenge him.

After the conference, I checked my email and came across an article in the U.K.'s Daily Mail. The headline reads, "Chlorine doubles the rate of birth defects." The article goes on to report, "Pregnant women living in areas where tap water is heavily disinfected with chlorine nearly double their risk of having children with heart problems, a cleft palate, or major brain defects, a new study has found. "Scientists say expectant mothers can expose themselves to the higher risk by drinking the water, taking a bath or shower, or even by standing close to a boiling kettle. The danger comes from chemical by-products in chlorinated water known as trihalomethanes, or THMs, which can be absorbed through the skin. They can then pass into the womb. "Earlier studies linked chlorinated water to an increased risk of
stillbirth, miscarriage, birth defects and bladder cancer. But this is the first time that the risk has been narrowed down to specific birth defects."

Last week, the journal Environmental Health published the full study.

photo: Fredrik Thommesen

Comments
"...but no one stood up to challenge him..."
Posted by miswit | Fri, Jun. 13, 2008

Why didn't YOU stand up to challenge him?

I second that
Posted by Jensen | Thu, Jun. 19, 2008

It's interesting that you blame everyone else for doing nothing while you stood there and let it happen. I honestly don't blame that much for choosing not to stand up, but it's hypocritical to imply that the others in the room were to blame for inaction.

Thank you for telling me
Posted by LeanGreenFightingMachine | Thu, Jun. 19, 2008

Thank you for telling me about this problem, I think posts like this are great, and if I ever know someone pregnant I'll be sure to pass on this information.

Come now...
Posted by Scotty Cox | Wed, Jun. 25, 2008

Jensen & miswit -
I don't think in any way that Jeffrey was blaming anybody else (let alone everybody?!) in the room for inaction, and perhaps he should have spoken up but just how many times have you found yourself in that position where you wished you would have said something, after the fact?!
And besides I'm sure he wanted to have his facts straight, especially the latest evidence pointing to chlorine's dangers - which if you read the post, he found after.

Scott

true...
Posted by Jensen | Sat, Jul. 5, 2008

I guess it comes from a frustration of the perception I have that those who have the power to make a true statement often do not because that place in power is so precarious. E.g. He could have lost a great deal of prestige from chemical execs in that audience if he had stood up and said something.

7th generation has a tough line to straddle. . . as a brand that is making the case for sustainability there is always pressure to move closer to the middle by the rest of the industry. Of course, many customers of "green" brands would like nothing better than to see the brand move even further on the sustainable fringe.