Skip to Content

Lighting for the Next Seven Generations

We've been lighting our world with incandescent light bulbs since electric illumination was invented in the 1870s. But that's about to change. In less than a year, those familiar icons of modern living will be banned in the U.S.

Not all at once and not technically forbidden, but pulled from store shelves for sure. Next January, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 will begin requiring that incandescent light bulbs emitting between 310 and 2600 lumens of light be made 30% more efficient. The new standards start with 100-watt bulbs and work their way down to 40-watt bulbs in 2014. Because existing incandescent technologies can't meet this 30% requirement, they'll be effectively banned. Light bulbs outside of the specified range (i.e. those less than 40W or more than 150W) are exempt along with a variety of special-purpose bulbs.

So for all practical purposes, the trusty incandescent is toast. What is the impact on the average user? Prices for compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs), LED bulbs, and other replacements have come way down and these new bulbs do everything stodgy incandescents do for a lot less. According to the Department of Energy, if we each replaced just one incandescent with a CFL, every year we'd save enough energy to light 3 million homes not to mention $600 million and 9 billion pounds of greenhouse gas emissions (that's 800,000 cars' worth). Your own bulb will personally save you $40 over its lifetime by using 75% less energy. And that's just one bulb. Imagine what happens when replace all our bulbs.

Better yet, don't imagine it. Just do it and say goodbye to high lighting bills, and huge carbon footprints by replacing your incandescents now. Here's what you need to know:

  • CFLs and LEDs (which are newer and pricier) come in just about every shape and size for almost every application. If you're replacing a 40W incandescent use a 9-12 watt CFL. A 60W bulb is replaced by a 13-18W CFL. A 75W equals a 19-24W CFL. And a 100W incandescent bulb equals a 25-30W CFL.
  • Fixtures in high ceilings may call for more CFL wattage than the above equivalencies indicate because CFL light is typically more diffuse than incandescent light.
  • Similarly, this diffuse CFL light can occasionally look a bit dingy in eye-level fixtures designed for incandescents. Here you may also want to trade up to a higher wattage level to maintain brightness.
  • Dimmable and 3-way fixtures require CFLs expressly labeled for the purpose. Using regular CFLs in these sockets is a fire hazard.
  • Don't use a CFL in a completely enclosed fixture like a recessed can with a bulb cover. (Indoor reflector CFLs can generally be used in open recessed cans.)
  • If you want to start slow, replace the bulbs in fixtures that are usually on for at least two to three hours per day. Because CFLs take from 30 seconds to three minutes to warm up and reach optimum efficiency, they won't do much for you in closets and other short on-time locations.
  • Remember that CFLs contain very small amounts of mercury, which will never escape an unbroken bulb. When breakage happens, open the nearest window for ventilation and clean up carefully. Dispose of old bulbs at your local hazardous waste collection site or retailer take-back programs.

Comments (26)

Posted by: JenChen

It's all about the light...

I've been reading about this change over for several years now. In every article and blog, it's been go CFL and save energy. That's great and I'm all about saving energy but not at the expense of my health. I have yet to experience a CFL lightbulb that's easy on my eyes and doesn't produce a headache. CFL lighting may have gotten substantly better than the old floresent but they still haven't resolve the problem--their light is still harsher than traditional bulbs. I was so delighted when the REVEAL bulbs came out--clear crisp light, easy on the eyes, great to read under. For me, it's all about the quality of light. I'm a big reader and as I get older, light quality is becoming more and more important. It affects how well I see at night. So, I'll do whatever I have to and pay the extra costs to keep using my traditional REVEAL lightbulbs. Only when the industry makes a CFL comparable in light quality to a tradtional bulb will I voluntarily switch. Hopefully by then they'll also resolve the mercury issue too.

Posted by: doogie360

mercury underrated

I agree with the other posts stating that the mercury concern is a problem that is glossed over. Break one or two in your home and the dust will be there a long while even with good cleaning. True, electric plants produce toxins too. LEDs are far more efficient, but not yet available for high power for consumer use. I think this is the way to go and where to put the emphasis.

Posted by: jamalogist

LED. Gov't should not be in the business of "picking the winner"

Contrary to one of the last posts, LED's are actually even more efficient. They use between 3 to 5 watts. They do not flicker, hum, take time to warm up, or contain mercury. They have a better color rendering index and are more "full spectrum". They are also more aesthetically pleasing than the curly CFL's, and so is their light output.

What bothers me is their price, obviously, but even more so, the fact that my local power company is "picking winner" by offering subsidized CFL's. I believe government officials also suggest CFL's as the upgrade path. All this drives their price down, and keeps LED price up. It's a catch-22 -- LED's will never get cheaper if they don't get adopted.

Also, halogens are exempt from the ban. They are a type of incandescent, just as inefficient, to the point they are a burn and fire hazard to nearby fabric, paper, or even plastic objects, not to mention children. IKEA and other retailers are including them in the list of energy-efficient alternatives. Why? Because there is no CFL upgrade path for them. LED's, however, make great replacements for 20w or 50w halogens, and use 2.5w with no fire burn hazards. Why is that upgrade not being promoted? Because it does not advance the CFL. There is an agenda at play here, and it is not necessarily the one that's being claimed.

Posted by: lakeland

electricity comes from coal burning plants that spew mercury

No one has mentioned where they think there electricity comes from. The majority of our electricity in the US comes from coal burning power plants which creates global warming greenhouse gases and spews mercury and other pollutants in the air. People think that Rocky Mountain National Park here in Colorado has pristine air and water but this is not true at all. There is mercury in the fish due to coal burning power plants that spew mercury into the air and then it winds up in the water where plants and animals accumulate it. As you know, eating fish with mercury is not healthy. So if you decide not to use CFL's, you are still contributing to the problem and getting exposed to mercury because of the source of our electricity. CFL's reduce electricity. So why is there no outrage at our mercury exposure from coal burning power plants?

Posted by: aniawin

Flutemaker - I agree! How

Flutemaker - I agree! How are bulbs w/mercury BETTER for the environment??

Posted by: jenan

cfl bulbs are awful

We recently moved into a rental that was outfitted with cfl's. We were unaware of this and I started having bad headaches and fatigue. I thought that there was something wrong with my eyes as well. Once we realized that the clf's were all over we promptly changed them out and my symptoms are gone. Also, "CFL light can occasionally look a bit dingy" is a major understatement. Until technology can come up with something that doesn't make me feel like i'm in a Walmart SuperCenter, I'll stick with my regular bulbs. I find this government intrusion in my life disturbing at best. My kids are known to break lightbulbs. What happens when they get mercury poison? This is so rediculous. Another government program for that, I suppose. No wonder our country is broke.

Posted by: robertaervin

CFLs

The January, 2010 edition of Prevention magazine, Page 93, reported CFLs are one of the worst creators of transient radiation. A CFL saves energy by turning itself on and off repeatedly, as many as 100,000 times per second. Preliminary research suggest that exposure to transients may elevate blood sugar levels among people with diabetes and prediabetes and that after schools installed filters to clean up transients, two-thirds of teachers reported improvement in symptoms including headache, dry eye, facial flushing, asthma, skin irratations and depression. Transients are particularly insidious because they accumulate and strengthen, their frequency reaching into the dangerous RF(radio frequency) range. We don't know definitely how much electrical polution is harmining us, but I and Prevention say it's better to limit the use of CFLs and other exposure(cell phones, cordless phones (use a speakerphone or wired earpiece-hollow cord type, wireless routers). Incandescnt or LED bulbs are better for your health as are wired devices or keep wireless as far as possible from your desk and children's rooms. Also, read the Prevention article for more protective moves and evidence.

Posted by: ZenRuth

Incandescent Bulbs--More than Just Light

I use a mix of incandescent and CFLs in my home and home based business. Living in Central Texas, I appreciate the cool CFLs in the summer. But in the winter, I use old fashioned incandescent bulbs for spot warmth. In my greenhouse, I also provide shelter for two "yard cats", strays that I feed and shelter. I provide a 100w bulb on their sleeping chairs to give them targeted heat at night. I don't think it will be more efficient to heat the entire greenhouse to a higher temperature, if I'm no longer able to buy 100 watt bulbs. I similarly provide "hot spot" bulbs for my indoor cats, so I can keep the temperature low when I am not home. I don't think providing heating pads will be as cost effective or energy efficient. I fully expect the program "outlawing" conventional 100 watt bulbs by the end of 2011 to be modified. There are too many unpleasant aspects for it to last very long. Meanwhile, marking my calendar to stock up on 100 watt bulbs in Sept 2010.

Posted by: wildwillie

Forget it!!!

Stocking up and not switching.....Hate the new bulbs...Period...

Posted by: snoopy99eb

Mercury concerns

This really scares me. You can't possibly expect every person in the US, who would now be forced to buy CFLs, to dispose of the bulbs properly. There is an extreme lack of education among the general public on just how dangerous they are when broken or disposed of improperly. Take-back programs are too few and far between, and most people (even green-minded people) will not go out of their way to drive their old bulbs to a hazardous waste disposal center. They will simply toss the bulbs in the trash, where they will leak mercury into our environment and ground water. I am all for a greener world, but this is the opposite of what we're trying to accomplish. Who can I write to protest this new Act?

SSJ12, those ESL bulbs look like a good possible alternative. Anyone know where to get them?

Posted by: inkght

Shame on you, 7th Gen.

I agree with APLINDSEY10. There have been numerous reports on the ramifications of CFL's, as well as the health issues they cause...
Myself, I get headaches and severe eye dryness/strain. So does my daughter. One only need to look at other "green" websites, or go to YOUTUBE and search CFL Light Bulb Dangers, report, etc..., for some informative reports and videos. Sensitive folks, and those with any types of neuralgia/neuropathy, should ABSOLUTELY steer clear of them. Everyone should, in my opinion. For reasons on all levels - environment, health, govt. control, etc...

Posted by: JungleJag2004

CFLs

I was disappointed there wasn't more discussion on LED bulbs. They may not be as energy efficient as CFLs, but I do believe they are more efficient than incandesecent and no mercury. I started the switch to CFLs and had one go out within a couple months, and I ended up breaking it because I was storing it to take in for recycling. No more CFLs for me.

Posted by: mhdoyle4@gmail.com

Mercury in light bulbs

A little mercury in millions of light bulbs? Have you ever broken one of these bulbs? I have and the process to clean them up is very tedious. I don't like them and avoid using them and the government needs to stay out of it!

Posted by: pre101

Cfl

This ban will not effect me at all. I switched all my bulbs years ago. Why would anyone want to pay $3 for $1 worth of light?

Posted by: kijiab

Mercury and EMF's

We're kidding ourselves if we think the energy savings is worth the cost of mercury poisoning to our people and our environment. Then there's the critical issue of electronic magnetic frequencies (EMF's), which are doing everything from causing cancer to killing off the honey bees. We're just replacing one problem with several others and I refuse to participate in this...

Posted by: Cherii

CFLs

I am in full agreement with APLINDSEY10 as well as all the others who have complaints with this new light bulb. I would also like to add how I'm against another "GOVERNMENT TAKE-OVER" like this!! WHERE do we draw the line? The company that makes the most of these (GE) is "in bed" with the government and GE gives all these wonderful jobs to manufacture this "money-making" bulb to foreigners!! What a joke in this country's hard economic times. Why not give the small business man and young scientists the incentive to make something NOT so dangerous to our environment? In the big picture, the incandescent energy use is FAR less dangerous than the mercury leaking into our landfills AND we provide jobs to AMERICANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: APLINDSEY10

CFLs

I am shocked the environmental community would even consider promoting CFLs even with "small" amounts of mercury. Unfortunately, even a "small" amour of mercury exposure can cause health issues. Not to mention, most people will not dispose of CFLs in a safe manner. They will go into garbage cans and into landfills, only to leech mercury into the environment. With the Government mandating their use across America, multiply this risk by millions. Not to mention, recent concerns about CFLs and a possible adverse effect they may have on some people who experience seizures.

Posted by: snali1314

Concerns about CFLs and your health...

Here is a link that tells about some of the health concerns related to CFL usage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMvjA8Db5ZY

Posted by: dewey_decimal

Problems with CFLs

We have gradually transitioned our house to CFLs, and for the most part they work great, but I have noticed a few problems in the last few years:

1. They don't work well in the cold, so are not a good choice for outdoor lights

2. The light can look "cold" and industrial - make sure you buy a CFL that indicates it's a warm shade (can't remember exact wording).

3. Because they take a while to warm up, they are useless as a fridge light. I don't think you can use them in the oven either.

4. Many of them burn out way sooner than advertised. This was particularly a problem in the beginning. Not so much lately, so maybe they've improved them.

I think LED lighting is a much better long-term option.

Posted by: AlineClick

CFLs and cold temperatures

I recently replaced all my outdoor lights with CFLs and this winter we had night time temps below zero, and guess what? The CFL lights would not come on. I thought they had burned out but the next morning when it warmed up a bit outside they came on. This has happened several times this winter. So in my opinion, CFL don't seem to be a good idea for cold climates!

Posted by: jhammerly

CFLs

I wish I had the time to type out an article that I read awhile back in a local health periodical. It basically said that there were health issues related to CFLs, like migraines. The mercury adds up as well. In order to get the full time out of them, you need to leave them on for about 15 min. at a time, otherwise they just burn out.

There is a little mercury as well. How is this green? This can add up if everyone's throwing them out. I've been trying these for years and had quite a few burn out and I just tossed them because there was never any mention that they contained mercury. I have stopped advocating CFLs because I don't believe they're all cracked up to be. I recently bought incandescents for when my CFLs burn out. Hopefully soon the LEDs will be affordable.

Posted by: dorothyp

CFLs?

dorothy: They generate no heat. This is good in warm climates. But here in Quebec, I am happy for the heat generated by incandescent bulbs. Put one under the sink, or other places, to keep pipes from freezing. Banning the incandescents is really a dumb move. Energy efficiency needs to be looked at more closely. This is a knee-jerk reaction.

Posted by: dorothyp

CFL?

dorothy

Posted by: flutemaker

light bulbs

for all the reasons above, I do not like the new bulbs. How do we dispose of the mercury? In our rural area we don't have the recycling available in the city.. I heard that Lowe's takes them.. 51 miles away...how much gasoline? Also they do not last the length of time suggested, at least not at full brightness. they are already dull and I had 2 burn out after a short time. I have been told the number of times they are turned on and off determines their life expectancy. If so, we have to burn lights more hours to make them last longer. Seems opposite to what we are trying to do in being conscientous. All in all, I hope they do not outlaw the old bulbs, or if they do, I will buy some before this happens.

Posted by: co4hfamily

exceptions

Will the clear bulbs that go into bathroom fixtures be one of the exceptions to the outlawed bulbs? Is there a list of those exceptions somewhere? Thanks!

Posted by: ssj12

Your forgetting something

The other light bulb option, ESL.

http://www.vu1corporation.com/eslupdate/

Leave a Comment

You must be a member and signed in to post a comment.

Not a member?

Join Us Now

Already a member?

Connect via FaceBook